This is a topic about
general in life. Not related about something specific.
Like I have mentioned in one
of my blog posts, I have studied the study of "sources of life" for
around 10 years. One of the things that I have ignored in the past completely
is the strategic action of dealing with:
·
The mental networks of other people
·
The depth of understanding how the whole system works (Do they give the
correct appropriate solution? Sometimes, coordination of a different
personality or different module of thought is required than just a simple
personal suggestion or advice).
In my experience, dealing
with the impossible brings impossible results. What the world is good on this
moment is "specialization" and dealing with "physical
matter of things". That is what
most of the needs the civilization offers, and to some extent, they are foundational
and critical for the rest of the mind to be able to concentrate (so it does not
become much of a distraction by the sensual and physical experiences in the
world). It is interesting that we get a "pain" feeling when something
physically bother us, but no "pain" at all when we lie to ourselves
or we process things in a very faulty way. I think there must be equal amount
of attention to the physical and non-physical elements of the world, but for
the surivival of this world, it is governed by the physical realm. Thus, we
have to set a bigger priority on the physical elements, based on those circumstances.
For those that are very
abstract oriented as I am, I propose that you need to have two
identities in this world (yes, two identities, I am not kidding):
·
One identity that submits to the mental networks of other individuals.
·
One identity with a stronger focus that tries to get the
specialization knowledge of each individual without thinking of "How they
can they do better their job. Just forget it, the system is worked that way for
now". You can hold on your secret rather than sharing it and just plan it
for the long term of solving your own problems.
All are for the purposes to
take advantage (and not really to contribute or help. Your thoughs
anyways are radically out of the league in terms of society acceptance) for the
special circumstances our world is governed as.
The other identity is the
one where you seek out the truth. But seeking out the truth is best without
having any distractions to your life (whatever the rules our physical world
govern us, we have to solve them in some way or another). That is what the
other identity comes through to supplement on that vision.
The world is already
"in split" (its output has already been processed instead of being in
a process). So you have to deal it in a split way at this moment. You can
implement a method of patience or try to integrate it. However, I suggest you
do it at circumstances where your choices are better to implement it (better
prepared).
And thus, the idea of two identities is
born. One that you have to live on it because you have no other choice
in order to be in an advantage, and another where it seeks the truth, it
is a form of patience, so anybody may take a leap to it one day.
These thoughts I wish I knew
for a long time. At the same point, they are very reasonable. At the same time,
it is kind of hard to work in a life where you have to live a life of doing the
wrong thing, because undoubtedly, your actions create mental networks
that express a wrong thing and blindly gets integrated into
your personality. In some sense, you have to live with such consequences.
Ultimately, the means end of this goal is to use less of that type of "identity", but at the same time, I think using it helps a person to keep their "sanity" (only in terms of "this" world).
Ultimately, the means end of this goal is to use less of that type of "identity", but at the same time, I think using it helps a person to keep their "sanity" (only in terms of "this" world).